Cloud forensics across IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS models addresses the unique challenges of investigating distributed, multi-tenant environments where evidence resides on provider-controlled infrastructure rather than physical devices.
Investigators rely on audit logs, API histories, and snapshots, navigating jurisdictional limits, volatility, and dependency on cloud service providers (CSPs) for access.
This discipline reconstructs incidents like privilege escalations or data exfiltration by correlating artifacts from AWS CloudTrail, Azure Activity Logs, and SaaS audit trails, ensuring chain of custody despite dynamic scaling and encryption.
IaaS Forensics: Virtual Infrastructure Evidence
IaaS provides compute and storage control, yielding rich VM and network logs for timeline reconstruction.
AWS CloudTrail captures API calls (RunInstances, CreateSnapshot); VPC Flow Logs track traffic between instances. EBS snapshots preserve disk states; GuardDuty alerts on reconnaissance.
Challenges include ephemeral instances—capture metadata before termination.

Preservation requires rapid API exports; retain 90+ days via S3.
PaaS Forensics: Platform Service Logs
PaaS abstracts infrastructure, focusing on app/database logs with limited OS access.
Azure App Service logs track deployments; Functions execution traces serverless invokes. Database audits (RDS, Cosmos DB) reveal queries and access patterns. Limited visibility demands CSP cooperation; correlate with IaaS underlays.
Key artifacts:
1. Deployment histories, scaling events.
2. Container logs (Kubernetes audit events).
3. API gateway access for PaaS endpoints.
4. Multi-tenant isolation complicates attribution.
SaaS Forensics: Application Audit Trails
SaaS offers least control, relying on provider logs for user actions.
O365 Unified Audit Log records email forwards, share links; Salesforce event logs track record exports. Retention varies (90-365 days); export via APIs before purge.
Challenges: Black-box access, privacy clauses.

Legal demands (GDPR) limit exports; chain of custody via provider timestamps.
Cross-Service Correlation Challenges
Hybrid environments span models, demanding unified analysis.
Jurisdictional issues block data; SLAs often lack forensics clauses. Multi-tenancy risks co-mingling; volatility from auto-scaling erases VMs. Vendor dependency delays response—pre-provision forensic accounts.
Workflow:
1. Identify services via billing/IAM reviews.
2. Export logs via APIs (CloudTrail Lake, Sentinel).
3. Normalize timestamps; timeline reconstructions.
4. Validate with snapshots/metadata.
Tools: AWS Macie for data classification, Azure Sentinel for correlation.
Best Practices and Preservation Strategies
Preparation mitigates cloud-specific hurdles.

Challenges by Model:
IaaS: Instance volatility.
PaaS: Limited OS artifacts.
SaaS: Provider-only access.
In breaches, CloudTrail IAM pivots → Flow Logs exfil → SaaS downloads trace full kill chain